ONE SMALL STEP.....
Moon Anomalies and The Great NASA Cover-Up
MANY PEOPLE now feel that we have been told less than the whole truth regarding NASA's space program, in particular the Apollo Missions of the late Nineteen sixties and early Seventies. Recent research has shown that conditions on the Moon could be very different indeed to the 'official-line' announcements fed to us by the well-oiled NASA propaganda machine.
DR FAROUK EL BAZ, for example, one of NASA's foremost scientists, confirmed public suspicions when he stated that "not every discovery has been announced to the public". As I see it, this could turn out to be the understatement of the millennium!
Investigation has shown that, despite official statements to the contrary, there is no shortage of 'anomalous information' concerning the Moon and the space program. Indeed, it would fill several books, just to list and categorise it.
For instance, some of the original NASA photographs are huge (32"x24"). By the time they have been reduced in size to fit the pages of a small paper however, and the clarity has been further reduced by copying processes, images can become pretty meaningless. In many cases, researchers are left little more than 'smudges' and 'bIurs' and often try to make every little details into another amazing feature. The no scientific reason why these images should be so ill-defined.
Another problem is that of access. Relatively few people have ever been allowed to view the massive NASA archives (photographs supposedly in public domain). Instead we have to make do with the two or three dozen 'reproductions' that appear in all the 'official textbooks, and this despite the fact that there have now been literally millions of photographic images obtained by NASA. Something is seriously amiss. Even so, and despite all this, abundant evidence does still exist which, when scrutinised under the proverbial - and literal - microscope points to the fact that virtually ever thing NASA has told us about the moon is a lie.
The real NASA Moon photos, for example (those that have not been tampered with) show all kinds structures, seemingly both old an new - domes, pipelines, and even pyramids. why aren't these photos in the public domain?
To add to this, in several segments of official NASA film footage, the American flag is seen to 'flap in the wind' (and yet the Moon, according to NASA, has no atmosphere; it is a vacuum). One film clip clearly shows a despair-ate astronaut trying his level best to hold the flag still!
In the same breath, we are told that the classic 'Neil Armstrong footprints' will remain etched on the Moon's surface for ever. We are told this precisely because the Moon's 'atmosphere' is a vacuum. (The laws of physics demand that dust becomes hardened and compressed in a 'vacuum', thereby ensuring the 'foot-prints' remain undisturbed.) And yet great plumes of dust have been filmed spewing up from the back of the 'Moon Buggy' as it travels across the Moon's surface. Is the 'vacuum theory' some kind of wild hoax perpetrated by NASA?
Another instance of the 'great NASA cover-up' are the small cloud formations that have been photographed above the Moon (again, in a vacuum?). And speaking of clouds, perhaps one of the least talked about 'Moon anomalies' is the ONE HUNDRED MILE WIDE CLOUD OF VAPOUR that was detected by NASA's own instruments. This embarrassing 'anomaly' was promptly explained away by NASA scientists - they said it was the result of the considerable volume of urine ejected by the Apollo Mission astronauts! (What in heaven were they given to drink?!)
THERE IS A GREEN HILL FAR AWAY...
For decades, strange 'lights' and artificial seeming structures have been observed and recorded on the Moon by amateur astronomers. Science writer, Joseph Goodavage, for example, observed that over two hundred white 'dome-shaped' structures had been seen and catalogued, but that "for some strange reason they often vanished from one place and reappeared somewhere else". There are even colour photos from the Apollo 8 mission, that show clear evidence of green vegetation on the lunar hills. This gives a whole new meaning to the song ‘There Is A Green Hill Far Away..."
Another point to consider is this. NASA was created by President Dwight D Eisenhower, on October 1, 1958, to "co-ordinate national space activities". One of the urgent reasons given for expanding the program was to take "full advantage of the military potential of space", and yet at the same time to "administer the civilian space program". While the Moon is indeed recognised as an ideal base from which to explore space this paradox surely begs a series urgent questions.
Questions like:JUST WHO THE HELL DO THEY THINK THEY ARE?
1. Did you know...
That before the 'official' Moon landings, the main debates regarding the purposes for travelling to the Moon were to do with mining and mineral rights?
This begs its own question: Bearing in mind the fact that rich deposits of titanium, aluminium, uranium, helium-3, and heaven-only-knows-what-else, were found on the Moon, do you really think Uncle Sam would then have told the world: '~Hey, come on up boys, there s gold in them there hills, for all the world to share!?" I hardly think so.
In his book, Men From Earth, the second astronaut on the Moon, Buzz Aldrin, states "Another exciting energy resource on the moon is.. .an ample supply of the isotope helium-3 (He 3), which is very rare on Earth but has been deposited on the lunar surface over billions of years by the solar wind. It is now estimated that at least a million tons of He-3 are readily recoverable from the regolith formations where lunar solar power stations would be practical. This He-3 offers a key to safe, practical nuclear fusion energy on Earth. It is estimated that a single ton of He-3 delivered to Earth would be worth at least $1 billion."
Need I say more?
2. Did you know...
That, as well as the 'footprints' and 'flag flapping' anomalies, official NASA film footage also shows one astronaut disembarking from the lunar module rather 'heavily'?
After descending the ladder at a cautious rate of knots, he leaps from the last rung (which is several feet from the ground) and hits the Moon's surface with a hefty thud! So what about the Moon's gravity being approximately one sixth of the Earth's own gravitational pull? Is that hogwash, too?
Even bearing in mind their weighted space suits (which, official NASA announcements claimed, weighed 185-190 pounds - this plus the astronauts' body weight should have made the combined weight relative to Earth about 62 pounds, or about four and a half stone; this is corroborated by another quote from Buzz Aldrin's book, Men From Earth, in which he states: "I weighed only 60 pounds.") the astronauts should have been able to jump over 6 feet. Official film footage, however, clearly shows the astronauts struggling to jump over eighteen inches! According to the laws of physics, this simply does not add up.
3. Did you know...
That official NASA film footage clearly shows an Apollo module taking off from the Moon's surface, evidently minus any conventional propulsion system?
Despite official 'artists impressions' of this event (which depict great plumes of fire and flame as the rocket engines ignite) on the film footage no such ignition is evident. Instead, a series of 'bolts' clamping the module to the Moon's surface are seen to explode, like Guy Fawkes bangers. The module then simply 'floats' back up into space. Is this evidence of an antigravity propulsion system already in use by 1969? Or were we shown a computer-simulated take-off from Hollywood's Moon Landing Studios? I suggest you check it out for yourselves, because it sure as hell beats the logic out of me. It defies the laws of physics entirely.
4. Did you know...
That a "powerful arm within the US administration", as one Congressman put it, is behind a massive cover-up and disinformation program?
This so-called 'powerful arm' is otherwise known as the 'Secret Government', a megalomaniac consortium comprising a relatively small group of super wealthy, super-powerful elite, who administer their 'world management schedules' via the super-secret US intelligence agencies.
For some inexcusable reason these people seem to think this information is their sole property, and they go to unimaginable lengths to keep it hidden from the public. An educated public is, in their eyes, a threat to their own power and control mechanisms. They are responsible for keeping untold mouths and minds firmly closed in the interests of 'national security'. They have no right to act in this manner. Planet Earth, the Moon, and the frontiers of unexplored space, all fall ~nto the category of 'public domain access'. It is high time we stood up as one nation, one voice, and said so.
After all, if we all declared ourselves 'one nation; then the specious argument for 'national security' interests would crumble like a house built on quicksand. Which, effectively, is precisely what that argument is.
WHAT CAN BE DONE?
With these facts in mind, I would ask you to simply stop and think. I would ask you not to believe me, but to carry out your own research, check things out for yourselves.
The Age of Aquarius, as I under-stand it, is the age of self-empowerment and self-realisation. It is the age of informed individuals working together for the good of the entire race. We are no longer in the age where centralised power cells such as NASA and the intelligence community can be allowed to palm us off with their half-truths, lies and disinformation schedules.
It is only our own fears and conditionings, and our apathetic attitudes towards injustices (such as the great NASA cover-up) that enable them to 'educate' us to their own double-edged agendas. Only we can change that.
Below is a glossary of relevant books, none of which contain the whole truth, though each one does contain an intrinsic piece of the puzzle.From an article by JIM MILLS for the excellent UK magazine "UFO REALITY"