One of the biggest lies being perpetrated upon the American public and the rest of the world, is that the global temperature is rising and will cause havoc like the world has never seen before. This is being used as a scare tactic excuse to eliminate freon for air conditioners, barbecues, small gasoline engines, and a host of other commonly used consumer products. To ban these products, laws must be issued. The resulting laws give muscle to the Environmental Protection Agency which has demonstrated a Nazi/Fascist like mentality over the taxpaying public. These Liberal/Marxist extremists are taking away our rights to property and all manner of pleasure. If what they claim were true, then much of what they want to do would be justifiable in minds of some. However, the lies they peddle are unconscionable, and perhaps, as with the Marxists, pathological.

On the matter of global warming, it should be noted, that atmospheric scientists are the experts, not some computer modelers, leftist politicians, or the leftist media. It should also be noted that many experts like Dr. Richard Lindzen of M.I.T. and Dr. Robert Balling Arizona State University have been refused publication by the national media. WHY? Can't the liberal media stand the truth? When have you heard arguments against global warming? The scientists listed below have been trying to get the truth to you for years. These are our nations top experts on the matter.

For a very comprehensive listing of facts, data, statistics, test results, etc., on the matter of global warming, see this website. There is no greater authority. You'll find it absolutely fascinating.

WASHINGTON, D.C., FEBRUARY 27, 1992---As independent scientists, researching atmospheric and climate problems, we are concerned by the agenda for UNCED, the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, being developed by environmental activist groups and certain political leaders. This so-called Earth Summit is scheduled to convene in Brazil in June 1992 and aims to impose a system of global environmental regulations, including onerous taxes on energy fuels, on the population of the United States and other industrialized nations.

Such policy initiatives derive from highly uncertain scientific theories. They are based on the unsupported assumption that catastrophic global warming follows from the burning of fossil fuels and requires immediate action. We do not agree.

A survey of U.S. atmospheric scientists, conducted in the summer of 1991, confirms that there is no consensus about the cause of the slight warming observed during the past century. A recently published research paper even suggests that sunspot variability, rather than a rise in greenhouse gases, is responsible for the global temperature increases and decreases recorded since about 1880.

Furthermore, the majority of scientific participants in the survey agreed that the theoretical climate models used to predict a future warming cannot be relied upon and are not validated by the existing climate record. Yet all predictions are based on such theoretical models.

Finally, agriculturalists generally agree that any increase in carbon dioxide levels from fossil fuel burning has beneficial effects on most crops and on world food supply.

We are disturbed that activists, anxious to stop energy and economic growth, are pushing ahead with drastic policies without taking notice of recent changes in the underlying science. We fear that the rush to impose global regulations will have catastrophic impacts on the world economy, on jobs, standards of living, and health care, with the most severe consequences falling upon developing countries and the poor.

Please note: Affiliations listed are for identification purposes only.